Bail & Conditional Release

Bail & Conditional Release

How Do Bail and Conditional Release Work in a Minnesota DWI Case?

When a person is arrested for a DWI, they may have to post “bail” to the court. This is designed to ensure their appearance at future court hearings, and/or have conditions imposed on their release (often referred to as “conditional release”). Depending on the circumstances of the case, bail or conditional release may be required by statute.

When Is Bail or Conditional Release Not Required in a Minnesota DWI Case?

Bail or conditional release is not required when it is a defendant’s first- or second-time offense, no child is in the car, and the alcohol concentration level is below 0.16, or it is a first-time offense and the defendant refuses to submit to the implied consent test. Put differently, that means bail or conditional release is not required for the following levels of offenses:

  • 4th Degree DWI
  • 3rd Degree DWI – Refusal
  • 3rd Degree DWI (not resulting from child endangerment or a high reading as the aggravating factor)

Most times, when these factors are present, the defendant will be released to a sober third party or held until they are sober to leave – which some jurisdictions require to be below 0.04 as a matter of policy.

One important caveat – the above general rules do not apply to a defendant with a driver’s license that is canceled as inimical to public safety.

Finally, it’s important to understand that mandatory bail or conditional release is only required when the defendant is arrested, taken into custody, and then detained until their first court appearance – or until an attorney can get a judge to order bail before the court appearance. If the defendant is arrested and then released, mandatory bail is not required. An example may help in understanding this distinction.

When a person submits to a blood or urine test, it takes time for those results to return. If the results indicate an alcohol concentration above 0.16, then mandatory bail would have been required. But, because the person was already released, then the mandatory bail conditions are not required by statute. Some courts don’t know this nuance and may still feel inclined to order bail – which is another reason why it is critical to get an experienced attorney involved on your behalf right away.

When Is Bail or Conditional Release Required in a Minnesota DWI Case?

If the defendant is facing the following DWI charges, then mandatory bail or conditional release is required:

  • 3rd Degree DWI – because of child endangerment or a high reading
  • 2nd Degree DWI
  • 1st Degree DWI

The maximum mandatory bail for a 3rd or 2nd Degree DWI is $12,000.00. There is no maximum amount for a 1st Degree DWI – though, it can get into six figures, depending on the circumstances, and conditions of release are also required. If the court orders maximum bail in a nonfelony case, it will not include any other terms or conditions of the defendant’s release. In lieu of paying this amount, the defendant may pay a bail bondsman to post the full amount on their behalf. A bail bondsman typically charges 10% of the bail amount to be posted.

Alternatively, the court may deviate from the maximum bail and instead order a reduced bail amount and impose conditions of release, such as requiring the defendant to abstain from alcohol and to submit to electronic alcohol monitoring for the duration of the criminal matter. When electronic alcohol-monitoring equipment is available to the court, the monitoring must involve at least daily measurements of the person’s alcohol concentration, and the court must require partial or total reimbursement from the person to the extent the person is able to pay.

As a result, asking for and receiving conditional release may end up costing the defendant more than the maximum bail by the end of the matter after considering the reduced bail and daily electronic monitoring fees – especially when the criminal matter takes several months to resolve. Further, any violations of the conditions of release subject the defendant to further issues, such as potential jail time. Consequently, it is usually best for a defendant to post the maximum bail rather than receiving conditional release.

What Conditions Can Be Ordered Instead of Maximum Bail?

For nonfelony DWI cases where the conditional-release statute applies, the core conditions are abstaining from alcohol and submitting to electronic alcohol monitoring with at least daily measurements of the person’s alcohol concentration, if that equipment is available to the court. The person may also be responsible for partial or total reimbursement of the monitoring cost, to the extent the person is able to pay.

One important update to Minnesota’s conditional-release law is the ignition interlock exception. A court is not required to order a person charged with 1st Degree DWI, 2nd Degree DWI, or 3rd Degree DWI to submit to electronic alcohol monitoring if the person becomes a program participant in the ignition interlock program. The court, county agency, or probation office may provide a list of certified Minnesota ignition interlock vendors, but generally may not require or suggest a particular vendor.

How Does Bail Work in Felony DWI Cases?

As explained above, there is no maximum bail amount in a felony DWI case. But, unlike gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor cases, felony DWI cases require the court to impose conditional-release terms before a person may be released from detention. Depending on the court rules that apply, the court may also have to fix the amount of money bail without other conditions upon which the defendant may obtain release.

The terms of conditional release may include:

  • No use of alcohol or controlled substances;
  • Impoundment of the registration plates of the vehicle used to commit the violation, unless already impounded;
  • If the vehicle used to commit the violation was an off-road recreational vehicle or a motorboat, impoundment of the off-road recreational vehicle or motorboat;
  • Weekly reporting to a probation officer;
  • Random alcohol tests or urine analyses at least weekly;
  • If convicted, reimbursement to the court or county for the total cost of these services; and
  • Any other conditions of release the court deems appropriate.

For more on Minnesota’s DWI law, click here.

No. Bail or conditional release is not required in every DWI case, especially where it is a first- or second-time offense, no child was in the car, and the alcohol concentration was below 0.16. It also may not be required for a first-time refusal case if the person was released instead of held until a first court appearance.

Mandatory bail or conditional release is generally required when the defendant is detained for a first court appearance and the charge is a 3rd Degree DWI because of child endangerment or a high reading, 2nd Degree DWI, or 1st Degree DWI. The rule turns heavily on whether the person was arrested, taken into custody, and held.

The maximum mandatory bail for a 3rd or 2nd Degree DWI is $12,000.00. If the court orders maximum bail in a nonfelony case, it will not include other terms or conditions of release.

Yes. The court may deviate from maximum bail and impose a reduced bail amount with conditions of release. Those conditions commonly include abstaining from alcohol and electronic alcohol monitoring with at least daily alcohol-concentration measurements when the equipment is available.

It can. Electronic alcohol monitoring includes daily fees, and the criminal matter may take several months to resolve. After considering reduced bail, monitoring costs, and the risk of violations, conditional release may end up costing more than posting maximum bail.

Violating release conditions can create further issues in the criminal case. Those issues may include the possibility of jail time and stricter release terms.

Yes. In a felony DWI case, there is no maximum bail amount, and the statute requires conditional-release terms before release from detention. Those terms may include weekly probation reporting, weekly random alcohol tests or urine analyses, impoundment requirements, reimbursement if convicted, and any other conditions the court deems appropriate.

In some cases, yes. A court is not required to order electronic alcohol monitoring for a person charged with 1st Degree DWI, 2nd Degree DWI, or 3rd Degree DWI if the person becomes a participant in the ignition interlock program. The court or agency may provide a list of certified vendors but generally may not require or suggest a particular vendor.

Talk to North Star Criminal Defense About Bail or Conditional Release

If you or a loved one is being held after a DWI arrest, it is critical to get an attorney involved right away. North Star Criminal Defense can help address bail, conditional release, and the court’s options at the earliest stage of the case.

Assault Charges
DWI Charges
Drug Charges
Expungements
Our Team

State v. D.M.

July, 2026
4th Degree DWI – Misdemeanors
Dismissed. Once Mr. Gempeler sought to schedule a contested hearing to challenge the legality of the felony stop executed on our client, the State immediately dismissed the case, knowing full well that the argument was strong and Mr. Gempeler would win. Additionally, the State knew additional discovery sought on the officer in question would reveal damaging information that would only further bols

State v. E.L.

June, 2026
Misdemeanor 4th Degree DWI Charges
Plea to an amended count of failing to drive with due care as a misdemeanor and all DWI counts were dismissed. Typically, on first-time DWI offenses, any plea to a non-DWI crime is to careless driving. But here at North Star, we push for better and often get it, such as in this case. For an individual going through the immigration system, achieving such a fantastic result was critical to his chanc

State v. D.R.

June, 2026
Misdemeanor 4th Degree DWI
Plea to an amended count of failing to drive with due care and the DWI charges are dismissed. Another example of the North Star team not settling for the quick and easy outcome – a careless driving – and instead pushing for the even better outcome. It might not seem like much, but getting a failing to drive with due care may help avoiding termination of insurance coverage and it looks better on th

State v. R.W.

June, 2026
Multiple 2nd Degree DWI gross misdemeanor cases out of two separate counties
This young man, facing mandatory consecutive six-month jail terms, will serve two weeks on work release, then a pair of one-year probation terms, with no other significant sanction, due to his endless hard work in treatment, and a creative legal team convincing two judges to give him one more chance at right living. Facing a mandatory minimum sentence, and near-permanent interlock consequences fro

State v. J.P.

June, 2026
Felony fleeing in a motor vehicle; 3rd Degree DWI – Gross Misdemeanor
Stay of Adjudication. Wonderful client stopped for his second DUI near his workplace, late in the evening, and the officer left him, to go deal with a nearby fight… our man mistakenly heads off home, and catches a felony fleeing count, that unfortunately matched the statute. However, a combination of aggressive advocacy by Mr. Adkins and the North Star team, and client’s devotion to sobriety and r

State v. J.N.

May, 2026
Felony fleeing in a motor vehicle and gross misdemeanor DWI
Stay of Adjudication on felony fleeing, no jail; reduction of a HIGH test DUI case to a third degree, time served, minimal probation term/unsupervised. This client stared directly at a possible prison term in light of a terrible series of decisions the night of his arrest, but hustled to get credible with the Court, and impressed the State’s attorney so much the offer improved even at the point of